Bookmarks
Archive
« do you have to be attractive to make it in vegas?
When did electricity and running water become readily available in European homes? »

 

is not obama a cynical by setting a maximum wage?

jcard3 reloaded asked:


Did he set a maximum spent during his campaign? didn´t he used private jets and stayed in luxury hotels? if he wants us to trust him he should start investigating if all the members of his party have paid their taxes……. obama just sound like a southamerican dictator from the
50¨s

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20090204/ap_on_go_pr_wh/bailout_executive_pay

Looking for discounted, cheap, cocalo sugar plum crib sets?

Hector

Tags: , ,

This entry was posted on Thursday, March 12th, 2009 at 7:19 pm and is filed under luxury hotels. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

4 Responses to “is not obama a cynical by setting a maximum wage?”

  1. truthistrue8 Says:
    March 16th, 2009 at 3:12 am

    Crystal

    Obama wasnt asking for money to bail him out either.

    Dont you think that is different?

  2. whiteflame55 Says:
    March 17th, 2009 at 1:30 am

    Fernando

    Wow, you’re missing the entire point. Yeah, people overspend, that’s going to happen with politicians. Your point is to say that since he’s doing that, he’s being hypocritical when he caps salaries for CEOs. When you stop there, you’re ignoring the most important part - these CEOs all had their companies bailed out by taxpayer dollars. When you leave that out, sure, it sounds terrible that Obama spends so much. I’d rather that he didn’t. But it’s a political thing, that’s not going to change. What can change is how we handle companies that we give money to.

  3. pastor of muppets Says:
    March 19th, 2009 at 10:52 pm

    Michael

    cynical?

    You bet he is.

    Every single one of us should be cynical about the salaries being paid to the CEO’s of companies that are being bailed out.

    If these companies were spending their money wisely in the first place, they wouldn’t need bailing out, now would they?

  4. tehabwa Says:
    March 22nd, 2009 at 7:51 am

    Marc

    That wasn’t tax money, but money people GAVE him, so he could become president.

    All members of his party? That’s hundreds of millions of people. Why shouldn’t Republicans have to pay THEIR taxes.

    Out of the hundreds of people he’s put in government, THREE owed taxes (which they’ve since paid) — get a grip; get a clue.

    Uh, if he sounds like a dictator to YOU, that’s a fact about YOU (that you’re completely cle-challenged), not about HIM.

Search
Categories