why does the tower without the Playboy bunny on the side at the Palms hotel in Vegas look so cheap?

Balla1 asked:


Why does the tower without the luxury suites (balcony pools) at the Palms hotel in Las Vegas look so cheap? Seriously, it looks equivalent to like Circus, Circus or Sahara. It’s just an ugly, tall, tan bulding.

Ruth

Tags: Balcony, Circus Circus, Palms Hotel In Vegas

This entry was posted on Tuesday, January 27th, 2009 at 12:15 pm and is filed under luxury hotels. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “why does the tower without the Playboy bunny on the side at the Palms hotel in Vegas look so cheap?”

1. Joey T Says:
   January 28th, 2009 at 5:25 am

   The tower in front was the original tower built in 2001 and the other was added in 2005. The other looks nicer probably because of all the revenue the hotel received.

2. Bridget M Says:
   January 31st, 2009 at 8:13 am

   i agree with joey when he said “The tower in front was the original tower built in 2001 and the other was added in 2005. The other looks nicer probably because of all the revenue the hotel received.” i also would like to add that this it the playboy tower. and hef will not let it be a cheap looking place with the playboy logo. they have to maintain that vision of playboy.

3. KAYSiE Says:
   February 1st, 2009 at 12:39 pm

   haha i live in vegas and i asked the same question when i first saw it. i think it has something to do with the fact that its the playboy tower and it was indeed built a few years after the original tower. all the fancy, high class, VIP only stuff goes on in the playboy tower now. hopefully they will renovate the older one to look as good as the newer one. lol

4. zuesefl Says:
   February 3rd, 2009 at 2:24 am

   I don’t think it is ugly, I think it all comes down to taste. It is just not as flashy as the first tower, so it does look plain next to it.

Leave a Reply