<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: why does the tower without the Playboy bunny on the side at the Palms hotel in Vegas look so cheap?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap</link>
	<description>A blog all about how to find the best luxury hotels</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2012 16:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: zuesefl</title>
		<link>http://www.luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap/comment-page-1#comment-448</link>
		<dc:creator>zuesefl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 02:24:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap/#comment-448</guid>
		<description>I don't think it is ugly, I think it all comes down to taste.  It is just not as flashy as the first tower, so it does look plain next to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it is ugly, I think it all comes down to taste.  It is just not as flashy as the first tower, so it does look plain next to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KAYSiE</title>
		<link>http://www.luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap/comment-page-1#comment-447</link>
		<dc:creator>KAYSiE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 12:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap/#comment-447</guid>
		<description>haha i live in vegas and i asked the same question when i first saw it. i think it has something to do with the fact that its the playboy tower and it was indeed built a few years after the original tower. all the fancy, high class, VIP only stuff goes on in the playboy tower now. hopefully they will renovate the older one to look as good as the newer one. lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha i live in vegas and i asked the same question when i first saw it. i think it has something to do with the fact that its the playboy tower and it was indeed built a few years after the original tower. all the fancy, high class, VIP only stuff goes on in the playboy tower now. hopefully they will renovate the older one to look as good as the newer one. lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bridget M</title>
		<link>http://www.luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap/comment-page-1#comment-446</link>
		<dc:creator>Bridget M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap/#comment-446</guid>
		<description>i agree with joey when he said "The tower in front was the original tower built in 2001 and the other was added in 2005. The other looks nicer probably because of all the revenue the hotel received."  i also would like to add that this it the playboy tower. and hef will not let it be a cheap looking place with the playboy logo. they have to maintain that vision of playboy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree with joey when he said &#8220;The tower in front was the original tower built in 2001 and the other was added in 2005. The other looks nicer probably because of all the revenue the hotel received.&#8221;  i also would like to add that this it the playboy tower. and hef will not let it be a cheap looking place with the playboy logo. they have to maintain that vision of playboy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joey T</title>
		<link>http://www.luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap/comment-page-1#comment-445</link>
		<dc:creator>Joey T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 05:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://luxury-hotels-blog.com/luxury-hotels/why-does-the-tower-without-the-playboy-bunny-on-the-side-at-the-palms-hotel-in-vegas-look-so-cheap/#comment-445</guid>
		<description>The tower in front was the original tower built in 2001 and the other was added in 2005. The other looks nicer probably because of all the revenue the hotel received.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The tower in front was the original tower built in 2001 and the other was added in 2005. The other looks nicer probably because of all the revenue the hotel received.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

